The Test: Two of Three of The Grace Series
A note before you read this.
This is the second piece in a series of three. If you’ve arrived here without reading the first piece on morality I’d ask you to go back and read it before continuing. Not because this won’t make sense without it but because it won’t land the same way.
The first piece asked you to sit with a question. This one needs you to have already sat with it.
I want to tell you about a moment before we go any further.
I walked into a conversation once carrying the full weight of everything I had ever learned about relationships. Every time I had opened up and regretted it. Every time acceptance turned out to be conditional. Every time I had let my guard down and paid for it. I had believed Liz was different but this was the moment that was either going to confirm that or break it. The weight of it was almost unbearable.
And then something happened that I didn’t have a category for.
I didn’t have to guard and protect my emotions for the first time in my life. Not because I decided not to. But because something in that room made guarding unnecessary. She brought the same fear I had brought. We were both braced for the worst and neither of us found it. What we found instead changed everything.
I didn’t have a word for what happened in that room. I still don’t know if I do. What I know is that it felt like finally finding my person and my home. Like something I had been carrying so long I’d forgotten it was weight simply set itself down.
If you have ever felt that — even a fraction of it — you already know what I’m about to tell you.
That was grace.
Not the certified, conditional, performance-dependent thing they labeled grace. The real thing. And it didn’t require a single conference decision to produce it.
I want to make a simple observation and I want you to sit with it honestly.
I cannot see any difference between genuine empathy and grace.
Not theologically. Not experientially. Not in what they produce in the human body or the human soul. When someone truly sees you — not the version of you that is compliant and correct and performing adequately — but the actual you, the broken and afraid and guarded you — and accepts what they find without condition, I cannot locate the difference between calling that empathy and calling that grace.
They feel identical because I believe they are identical.
Which means grace has been present everywhere genuine empathy has ever been extended. In every tradition. In every culture. In every moment across human history where one person fully absorbed the reality of another person’s suffering and responded without condition.
It was never the property of one institution.
And here is what follows from that.
If empathy and grace are the same thing then anything that cannot pass the empathy test cannot be grace. Regardless of what it’s called, who is delivering it, or how many scripture verses are attached to it.
Ask yourself one question about anything the institution presents as grace.
Does this feel like empathy?
Not does it follow the correct form, has it been approved by the right people, and certainly not does it align with the conference decisions.
Does it feel like what I felt in that room with Liz? Does it feel like what I felt from that person whose goodness I identified in yesterdays article — the one whose morality came from how they saw people rather than what they followed?
If the answer is no then what you are being handed is not grace. It has a different name. And you already know from the morality piece what that name is — control.
So here is what I want to leave you with.
Next time you sit in that service I want you to listen. Not for doctrine or correct theology. Just listen to the words being spoken from that pulpit and ask one question — is this empathy first?
Not empathy eventually or empathy underneath the correction and the compliance requirement. Empathy first.
Then think about the last personal interaction you had with your pastor. Not his public role or something he preached. The last time he sat across from you as a human being. Was it empathy first?
Then look at the people around you. The ones you do life with inside that community. Think about your recent interactions with them. Was empathy extended to you? And when you search your memory honestly — is empathy what you remember feeling from them?
If those answers aren’t all yes then what is present in that place is not grace. It may be community. It may be familiarity. It may be the comfort of a shared identity. Those things are not nothing.
But they are not grace.
You know what grace feels like now. You felt it when you read about that room where someone finally didn’t have to guard themselves for the first time in their life.
That recognition you felt — that was your nervous system remembering what it was built for.
Don’t let anyone tell you that what you’ve been handed instead deserves the same name.



For Stan and me, our first face to face meeting was over coffee in a (safe) public place following some emails and calls. My initial impression before meeting was that he was without a doubt the kindest man I'd ever encountered. No hint of troubles, pain or a history of the difficulties of being shunned by family and friends. When we met, it felt like finding home and safety - and we each were free to openly unburden our past issues with one another. And we were each met with empathy first and then grace which grew out of the empathic response to another's suffering. When you told of that feeling when you sat with Liz the first time, I was reminded of how that felt. I think the connection between human empathy and grace is a good one to make and it certainly is in line with my humanistic beliefs. Grace flows from within, it is not governed by a church, nor is it relegated to the mystery.